-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(ci): disable unstable scap-related perf test from perf PR comment and check #2017
Conversation
…nt and check. Signed-off-by: Federico Di Pierro <nierro92@gmail.com>
…writing a new one. Signed-off-by: Federico Di Pierro <nierro92@gmail.com>
/milestone 0.18.0 |
Perf diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - scap file
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: FedeDP, Molter73 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2017 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 74.14% 74.15%
=======================================
Files 253 253
Lines 30834 30834
Branches 5405 5406 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 22863 22864 +1
+ Misses 7965 7951 -14
- Partials 6 19 +13
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area CI
Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?
What this PR does / why we need it:
It disables the flaky scap-related perf test; moreover, it avoids polluting PRs with perf-related bot comments, instead editing existing one.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: